Andrea Schewe Design
  • Home
  • Costumes
    • Reader's Gallery
    • Fantasy Costumes
    • Theatrical
    • Historic >
      • Easier to make
    • International
    • Costumes for Kid's and Babies
  • Crafts
    • Home Decor >
      • Pillows
    • Fashion Accessories
    • Doll Clothes
    • For Kids and Babies
  • Blog
    • Past Blogs by subject >
      • My patterns by number
      • Sewing basics
      • Personal sewing Projects
      • Fashion History
      • Fun and funny stuff
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Crafts and Home Dec
  • Links
  • Contact

Vintage vs. Modern - one design, two patterns

6/19/2019

18 Comments

 
Picture
Today I am comparing this pattern from 1947 with its reissue that came out in 2013. It is a really pretty blouse. A good one to choose for a modern reissue. But, I know for a fact that Simplicity did not use the original pattern pieces for the first few reissues they published. Simplicity does not have an archive. So, they just drafted from scratch using the pattern envelope illustrations.

CORRECTION! Since I published this blog I found out Simplicity does have a small archive. They used to have a huge plant in Niles, Michigan. When then closed the plant a couple people from the New York office went there and rescued the old patterns that were there! They also started buying vintage patterns to reissue as well. (June 27, 2019)

After the first few reissues, Simplicity started buying copies of vintage patterns to do a proper job in house and also used patterns from the vintage collection my sister Theresa LaQuey has. She has a lot Simplicity patterns to her name!
Picture
Anyway, back to this pattern, which I happen to really like. I used it when I wrote my article on piecing for Threads in their Feb/March 2017 issue.

But, let's cut to the chase! Ever since I realized I owned a copy of the original 1947 pattern, I've been wanting to see how they are different. As a retired person, I now have the time.

I will show you the two muslins I sewed up. I chose the scoop neck view because the vintage pattern I have is cut away at the lower neckline so I can't make the one with the collar. This older pattern has one pattern for all three views with a cut away for the different necklines.

Now, you can just SEE the differences. Original is on the left.
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
So, you can see the original pattern emphasizes the shoulders much more, which makes the waist appear smaller. The 1947 pattern uses shoulder pads, which build up the shoulders as well. Also, the peplum slopes more and has more of the fullness in in the back. A flattering line, I think.

Now I will compare the wearing ease for the two patterns.

My vintage pattern is a 12 (30" bust, 25" waist) but I added 1" all around and lengthened the waist 3/4" so it would fit my modern size 6 dress form.. So it is now for body measurements of a 31" bust and 26" waist. The finished garment measurements are 37" bust and 26" waist. This gives 6" ease in the bust and no ease for the waist.


I used size 8 from the modern reissue. The body measurements are 31 1/2" bust, 24" waist. The finished garment is 34 1/2" bust and 26 1/2" waist. This gives 3" ease in the bust and 2 1/2" in the waist. 

Hmmmm. 6" to 3" difference for the bust ease and 0" to 2 1/2" difference in the waist. Or to put it a different way, the difference between the bust and waist for the 1947 pattern was 11"" and for the 2013 pattern only 8".

A little ease in the waist is nice but maybe not 2 1/2". Interesting, too, considering the body measurements in 1947 had the waist larger in proportions to the bust than now a days, even though the garment silhouette was more narrow waisted.
Picture
So, let's get down to the nitty gritty! Take a look at the patterns pieces given for each version.

4 vs. 14!!!


Why is this? Well, here are the pieces the 2013 pattern has that the original doesn't.
2 additional fronts and backs (with a multi size pattern you can't have a cut away for a second necklines)(too many lines, too confusing)
4 facings (front and back for both necklines)(the original uses bias tape cut from scraps for the neck and the front pattern piece has an extension that folds back to form a self facing)
Waist ties (the original gives measurements to cut them by suggestion)
2 pieces for neck bow and knot (the original says to use a piece of knotted ribbon)

AND ...
Picture
2 different buttonhole placement strips (for the 2 different blouses in the 4 sizes offered in the multi sized pattern) That's a lot of tissue.

To amuse myself, I weighed the pattern pieces for each pattern. 

The pattern pieces for the 1947 pattern - 0.2 ounces, for the 2013 - 0.7 ounces.
Everything including envelope and instructions in 1947 - 0.7 oz, in 2013 1.6 oz.

WOW 
Picture
It is interesting to see the difference in the shoulders. The original has wider shoulder and a distinct underarm curve. The black dot along the shoulder seam in the original is for shoulder pad placement. 

For which, by the way, they give you no instructions or measurements. You were just expected to make shoulder pads.
Picture
The back shows the same differences even more clearly. 
Picture
You can see how the original pattern on the right has a tighter curve at the waist which gives the peplum more flare.

The original pattern instructs you to hem this peplum with bias tape used as a facing then hand slipped stitched in place. The newer pattern says to make a double rolled machine stitch hem. Just a sewing choice. 
Picture
I didn't make the view with the collar, but I thought you would be interested in comparing the two collar patterns. Very different!
Picture
Picture
Look at the two neck finishes. I really like the look of the bias tape. It does need to be hand slip stitched down. So it would take a little longer, but so nice! No big facing showing through.
Picture
Two more things to compare. I find it interesting that, to save fabric for some sizes, the older pattern asks the home sewer to open up the fabric to a single layer and wedge the pieces in very close. I don't think you can read it in the photo, but in tiny writing in the blank spaces on the older pattern is the word "bias", so people knew where to cut the bias for the neck, sleeve hem and peplum hem facings. Those spaces are not very large. This bias strips would have had to be pieced many times. And no where is a measurement for the length or width of this bias.

I'm not sure if the average modern sewer would have to patience to do all that, single layer cutting and making bias for everything. I would love to hear your opinions.
Picture
And last. The original pattern had 3 views, but the new one only 2. If you are just looking at the art on the envelope you can't really tell that one of the views is a high neck blouse without a collar. 

The original has a high neck with collar, high neck no collar and scoop neck views.
The newer one only had the high neck with collar and scoop neck.

So, there you have it. A glance into the minds of two pattern makers working 47 years apart from each other. Both pretty blouses, but different, for sure.

BUT, I'm thinking ... I bet I could modify the modern pattern to be more like the 
original. So, that will be a future blog, probably in a few weeks. Need to make a pair of pants that actually fit me. Pants are SO hard!!!

18 Comments
Cassandra Brecht
6/20/2019 10:12:28 am

Fascinating! I too like the bias facing much better. Thank you for your review!

Reply
Sarah
6/20/2019 11:15:44 am

Love this analysis! It explains so much of why vintage clothing just looks more refined in its proportions...because it IS.

Reply
Alena
6/20/2019 11:59:25 am

I like to vintage version more, it seems more flattering.
And I cut single layer a lot, I buy rests a lot so I have limited amount of fabric, cutting single layer I'm able to use much less fabric than recommanded, for example for Simplicity coat 8262 (and with some creative use of facings) I use 2,6 m instead 3,7 m of outer fabric.

Reply
Reader
6/21/2019 11:31:13 am

Fascinating comparison. I wouldn't mind doing a single-ply layout. Peplums are not for me.

Reply
Sharon
6/22/2019 01:35:22 pm

Wow! As a retired costumer, I found this fascinating! So many times in doing period plays at the college where I worked, I would have to take 'modern' patterns and tweak them because they just "didn't look quite right". Love how tidy the bias binding is on the neck! Thank you for a great piece!

Reply
Heieup
6/22/2019 02:02:26 pm

I love the original the proportions are more elegant to my eye. For single layer cutting. I do this all the time to save on fabric but I hate making bias tape lol ! I find modern layouts waste so much fabric that I never use them.

Reply
Saara
6/22/2019 02:19:45 pm

Thanks! I often wonder if these reprints are really the same. I think a much higher level of skills was presumed 'back in the day'. And I agree the bias finish is much nicer!

Reply
Bonita link
6/22/2019 05:08:08 pm

Wow, thank you for sharing this. I love this pattern, but I really love the old one more - the design is so much better! And I didn’t even realise.

Reply
Paola
6/23/2019 12:21:55 am

Wonderful!!! I am a vintage nostalgic fashion lover and I usually draft myself my own patterns when I want to reproduce a garment from old magazines and pictures. (I live in Andorra, Europe, and we do not have the fantastic Joann's sales) . I collect some of the new vintage and retro patterns from traditional brands like burda, simplicity, vogue, etc.. and I always wander what kind of adjustments have to be done to reedit the old patterns... Specially because sizes have changed, we are taller, etc.. Thanks so much for your so proffessional demonstration and analysis.

Reply
Ms Sam link
6/24/2019 06:32:53 am

It amazes me that the new pattern follows more modern structuring, despite the fact it is supposed to be a vintage reprint. I wear true vintage because I love the clean, fitted lines, versus the more blocky "universal sizing" of today's styles. How disappointing that the pattern doesn't follow the original. And, yes, I would appreciate having the option to open the cloth and piece the pattern. When using precious lengths of vintage cloth you sometimes have to squeeze things in to make it work. Thank you for such an informative post!

Reply
Demi link
6/24/2019 08:12:58 pm

How fascinating! I think I must be the only one, but I prefer the silhouette of the first one, maybe because I'm more used to a modern silhouette? But batwing sleeves have never been my thing anyways, I adore the dainty little capsleeves on the new version. However, there are many techniques I would take from the original (bias tape facings, for example) to bring it back to its roots. Great post!

Reply
Denise
6/24/2019 08:55:13 pm

Thank you so much for this article a really fascinating read. I have a number of vintage patterns and this opened my eyes and made me think about the fit and the differences.

Reply
Wendy link
6/26/2019 05:32:44 am

I have also have an original and a reprint of the same pattern. I have always thought the reprints were way too boxy to my eye, but now I have proof. (I never had time to do a side-by-side). Thank you for taking the time to do this!

Reply
Dee
6/27/2019 03:56:35 pm

Just found your blog thru this post. Thank you! Great to see the comparisons. Rather have the older patterns and can see why. Oldies but goodies!

Reply
Lynda Altman link
6/28/2019 08:42:55 am

Keep in mind that fabric was rationed in the U.S during war time. The rationing ended on March 15, 1949. The 1947 pattern was published during rationing and it used piecing and cutting in a single layer to save on fabric. Fabric was not only expensive, it was hard to get. The modern version did not have to account for rationing.

Reply
Ellie
6/29/2019 11:22:27 am

Perhaps the modern versions should be thinking about rationing fabric! Fabric production can be very damaging to the environment, and while obviously the fast fashion industry is far more harmful than the home sewer, it's always good to use less in the first place.

Reply
Andrea
6/29/2019 12:00:49 pm

Hear! Hear!

Sonya Baehr
7/1/2019 08:46:10 am

I really love the older version of this pattern! All the details are so much more flattering! Thank you for sharing your research with us.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    From Andrea 

    I am a commercial pattern maker who is now "sewing over 50"!
    I love to sew and hope to encourage others to come back to sewing.
    The water is fine!!

    Archives

    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013

    Archives by Subject

    To search for blog posts in specific categories, use the drop down menu above by hovering over the word "Blog"

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    RSS Feed

    Andrea Schewe participates in Amazon's associates program.